header-logo header-logo

The search for clarity in complex claims

08 August 2019 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Insurance / reinsurance , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Vijay Ganapathy provides an update on Brexit’s shadow on the future for uninsured & untraced drivers & revisits the painful repercussions of a Christmas party

  • Uncertainty re claims involving uninsured and untraced drivers.
  • Update on the law relating to vicarious liability.

As the Brexit deadline nears, one area of personal injury litigation where we could see considerable uncertainty, subject to any ‘Repeal’ Bill being implemented, is in claims involving uninsured and untraced drivers.

Article 3 of EU Directive 2009/103/EC (the Directive) requires member states to ensure vehicles used within its territory are insured. Article 10 further requires a body be set up to compensate the victims of uninsured or unidentified drivers. The Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) is the UK body set up for this purpose. The Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) made it compulsory for motor insurers to be members of the MIB and to contribute to its funding which they do by way of an annual increase (about £30) in driver premiums.

However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll