header-logo header-logo

05 December 2019
Issue: 7867 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The split: relocation & the child’s best interests

12704
Vanessa Friend provides a practical approach to international child relocation cases
  • Given the high stakes, the preparation required and the attendant cost, relocation applications are not for the fainthearted.

There is a fine art to relocation applications. The applicant must show the benefits to the child of moving abroad, whilst demonstrating that sufficiently good contact can be maintained with the left behind parent. The outcome of such cases is uncompromising, as Mr Justice Mostyn highlighted in NJ v OV [2014] EWHC 4130 (Fam): ‘The choices are starkly binary. One parent will lose and be bitterly disappointed. There is no scope for finding some comfortable middle ground.’

In this case the mother was successful in her application to relocate to Sweden. Mostyn J expressed his sympathy for the respondent father at para [70]: ‘This decision will compromise, up to a point, the father’s relationship with his daughter and that will be bitterly disappointing for him. As a human, I have to say I personally regret this a great deal.’

Given

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll