header-logo header-logo

The split: relocation & the child’s best interests

05 December 2019
Issue: 7867 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
12704
Vanessa Friend provides a practical approach to international child relocation cases
  • Given the high stakes, the preparation required and the attendant cost, relocation applications are not for the fainthearted.

There is a fine art to relocation applications. The applicant must show the benefits to the child of moving abroad, whilst demonstrating that sufficiently good contact can be maintained with the left behind parent. The outcome of such cases is uncompromising, as Mr Justice Mostyn highlighted in NJ v OV [2014] EWHC 4130 (Fam): ‘The choices are starkly binary. One parent will lose and be bitterly disappointed. There is no scope for finding some comfortable middle ground.’

In this case the mother was successful in her application to relocate to Sweden. Mostyn J expressed his sympathy for the respondent father at para [70]: ‘This decision will compromise, up to a point, the father’s relationship with his daughter and that will be bitterly disappointing for him. As a human, I have to say I personally regret this a great deal.’

Given

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll