header-logo header-logo

10 February 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The strangest of wills

38907
Mark Pawlowski looks at some strange & intriguing wills that have been the subject of judicial scrutiny

In the celebrated English case of Brown v Burdett (1882) 21 Ch D 667, the testatrix left her house to trustees upon trust to block up all the windows and doors in every room (except those in which she directed that a housekeeper and his wife should reside) for a period of 20 years and thereafter the property was to pass to the beneficiaries named in her will. The judgment, which expressly refers to the uselessness of the trust, highlights the fundamental question of whether it is open to a testator to divert (or even permanently exclude) property by his will from family and dependants purely on a whim, or on the basis of some eccentric notions of vanity and self-expression.

No humans

In the Australian case of Re Boning [1997] 2 Qd R 12, the testator left his house to trustees, for a period of 20 years, with the condition that all animals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll