header-logo header-logo

The strangest of wills

10 February 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
38907
Mark Pawlowski looks at some strange & intriguing wills that have been the subject of judicial scrutiny

In the celebrated English case of Brown v Burdett (1882) 21 Ch D 667, the testatrix left her house to trustees upon trust to block up all the windows and doors in every room (except those in which she directed that a housekeeper and his wife should reside) for a period of 20 years and thereafter the property was to pass to the beneficiaries named in her will. The judgment, which expressly refers to the uselessness of the trust, highlights the fundamental question of whether it is open to a testator to divert (or even permanently exclude) property by his will from family and dependants purely on a whim, or on the basis of some eccentric notions of vanity and self-expression.

No humans

In the Australian case of Re Boning [1997] 2 Qd R 12, the testator left his house to trustees, for a period of 20 years, with the condition that all animals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll