header-logo header-logo

The strangest of wills

10 February 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
38907
Mark Pawlowski looks at some strange & intriguing wills that have been the subject of judicial scrutiny

In the celebrated English case of Brown v Burdett (1882) 21 Ch D 667, the testatrix left her house to trustees upon trust to block up all the windows and doors in every room (except those in which she directed that a housekeeper and his wife should reside) for a period of 20 years and thereafter the property was to pass to the beneficiaries named in her will. The judgment, which expressly refers to the uselessness of the trust, highlights the fundamental question of whether it is open to a testator to divert (or even permanently exclude) property by his will from family and dependants purely on a whim, or on the basis of some eccentric notions of vanity and self-expression.

No humans

In the Australian case of Re Boning [1997] 2 Qd R 12, the testator left his house to trustees, for a period of 20 years, with the condition that all animals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll