header-logo header-logo

22 September 2023 / Richard Marshall , Kate Bridgland , Oliver Cooke
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Fraud
printer mail-detail

The UK financial crime regime: fit for purpose? (Pt 3)

138502
Rounding up their series on economic crime in the UK, Kate Bridgland, Oliver Cooke & Richard Marshall assess the potential of the proposed ‘failure to prevent fraud’ offence
  • The government is proposing a new ‘failure to prevent fraud’ offence for large organisations.
  • While the new provisions are narrower in scope than many have called for, it would nonetheless be a welcome development by increasing the protections available for consumers and businesses.

In answer, at least partially, to calls which have existed for some time, particularly since the implementation of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) and the Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA 2017), the government is drafting a new ‘failure to prevent fraud’ offence. Billed as a measure to close loopholes in the existing statutory legislation, some will question whether the move goes far enough to close said loopholes, while others are likely to argue it is a practical, realistic and welcome step. So which is it?

What is proposed?

While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll