header-logo header-logo

The US: jury unanimity needed (Pt 2)

47604
Justice is done. Michael Zander QC on the aftermath of the murder trial of Derek Chauvin
  • Without video evidence one wonders whether there would have been criminal charges, let alone a conviction.

There was immense relief in America—and certainly in many other countries too—that the trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin ended with verdicts of guilty on all three counts—second degree murder, third degree murder and second degree manslaughter of George Floyd. Chauvin’s bail was revoked and he was led from the court in handcuffs.

Given the overwhelming strength of the prosecution’s evidence and a diverse jury, an acquittal was always unlikely. But in the US the jury in a serious criminal case must be unanimous and there was always the possibility that the defence would succeed in persuading at least one juror to hold out against conviction and thereby cause a mistrial.

One thought it might take the jurors several days to sift through two weeks of evidence of over 40 witnesses,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Indemnity costs remain exceptional, but parties cannot ignore a case that deteriorates around them. In Lawrence v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs after finding their conduct, viewed cumulatively, fell ‘well outside the norm’
Public law is in flux following reversals and robust appellate intervention, according to the latest public law update by the team at HSFK for NLJ
Neurotechnology is turning the human mind into an operational domain, exposing gaps in the laws of war
back-to-top-scroll