header-logo header-logo

The US: jury unanimity needed (Pt 2)

47604
Justice is done. Michael Zander QC on the aftermath of the murder trial of Derek Chauvin
  • Without video evidence one wonders whether there would have been criminal charges, let alone a conviction.

There was immense relief in America—and certainly in many other countries too—that the trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin ended with verdicts of guilty on all three counts—second degree murder, third degree murder and second degree manslaughter of George Floyd. Chauvin’s bail was revoked and he was led from the court in handcuffs.

Given the overwhelming strength of the prosecution’s evidence and a diverse jury, an acquittal was always unlikely. But in the US the jury in a serious criminal case must be unanimous and there was always the possibility that the defence would succeed in persuading at least one juror to hold out against conviction and thereby cause a mistrial.

One thought it might take the jurors several days to sift through two weeks of evidence of over 40 witnesses,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll