header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018
Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Think again on small claims, say MPs

MPs have slated government proposals to raise the threshold for small claims

Increasing the small claims limit from £1,000 to £2,000 for employers’ liability and public liability claims, and to £5,000 for road traffic accident-related personal injury, would create significant access to justice concerns, according to a report this week by the Justice Committee. The change would be made by secondary legislation. The winning side cannot recover legal costs for small claims, which means solicitors cannot represent them on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, said the proposed increase raises concerns about the ‘financial and procedural barriers that claimants might face’. Although the Ministry of Justice is developing an electronic platform to help unrepresented claimants, Neill said ‘we remain to be convinced that this will be effective or sufficient’.

The report, ‘Small claims limit for personal injury’, makes several recommendations, including that the government work with the Association of British Insurers to provide reliable data ‘that avoids conflating unexpected consumer behaviour with fraudulent activity’ and to ‘monitor the extent to which any reduction in insurance premiums can be attributed to these reforms’, and report back after 12 months.

It recommends that the small claims limit be increased, but only to £1,500, in line with inflation.

Other recommendations include that the national roll-out of the electronic platform be delayed until at least April 2020, with employers’ liability and public liability claims excluded, and that the senior judiciary conclude its examination of McKenzie Friends as soon as possible.

Separately, the Civil Liability Bill, currently before Parliament, would introduce a tariff system for compensation of whiplash claims.

Vidisha Joshi, managing partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, said: ‘At last a glimmer of hope from the Justice Select Committee for innocent personal injury victims.

‘This is hopefully an indication that the government will get a justifiable grilling when the Civil Liability Bill reaches the House of Commons. The government needs to study this report and act in the best interests of access to justice, not in the best interests of insurers as it has done to date.’

Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll