header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Third runway victory for Heathrow objectors

A coalition of Heathrow expansion objectors has won a High Court victory after Lord Justice Carnwarth ruled the government’s plan to build a third runway was “untenable”.

Following the case, the objectors—who include six local authorities and Transport for London as well as environmental organisations—said the government’s case was now “in tatters”.

Delivering judgment in R (on the application of the London Borough of Hillingdon and others) v Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWHC 626 (Admin), Carnwath LJ said: “The department’s initial position in these proceedings was that the policy of support for the third runway proposal had been finally determined in 2003, subject only to fulfilment of the three environmental conditions identified at that time. That was in my view untenable.

“Even before the changes introduced by the Planning Act 2008, it was not open to the secretary of state simply to stand on the principle of the policy decision made in 2003, without regard to the important developments since then, particularly in relation to climate change policy.”
The ruling means the government now has to reconsider its entire case for the runway.

Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll