header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Three double acts

Democracy and human rights are bedding down well, says Roger Smith

Lady Justice Arden, tipped soon to join Baroness Hale on what will become the Supreme Court, has given a spirited defence of the Human Rights Act (HRA 1998). The “overarching” point of her address to a JUSTICE conference was that HRA 1998 has changed the way in which we think about democracy: “One of the byproducts of the Convention is that when it comes to qualified rights we are expressly directed to think about democracy …[and] much more thought … could usefully now be given to what is meant by ‘necessary in a democratic society’.”

This is a phrase used in the European Convention on Human Rights to qualify rights such as that of freedom of speech. Lady Arden speculated about how the creation of the Supreme Court might change the procedures of the House of Lords. The court will have, she acknowledged, the same powers as the existing appellate committee of the House of Lords. However, it was the “start of a new chapter” and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll