header-logo header-logo

Thrills & spills

09 December 2011 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Keith Patten reviews the implications of Dawkins upon liability in negligence & evidentiary burdens

 

At first sight the recent Court of Appeal decision in Dawkins v Carnival plc [2011] EWCA Civ 1237 may seem to be of only specialist interest, being a case which arose under the Athens Convention on the Carriage of Passengers by Sea. As Pill LJ points out, however, the test for liability under the Convention is essentially a negligence test and the issues which arose are substantially the same as would have arisen had the accident occurred on premises in England and Wales. The decision also reviews the oft-cited, and sometimes misunderstood, case of Ward v Tesco Stores Limited [1976] 1 All ER 219, [1976] IRLR 92.

The facts

The facts of Dawkins are relatively simple. The claimant was a passenger aboard the cruise ship Oriana. While walking through the conservatory restaurant at about 2pm she fell and suffered injury. The judge found as a fact that on the balance of probabilities she fell on some
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll