header-logo header-logo

Thrills & spills

09 December 2011 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Keith Patten reviews the implications of Dawkins upon liability in negligence & evidentiary burdens

 

At first sight the recent Court of Appeal decision in Dawkins v Carnival plc [2011] EWCA Civ 1237 may seem to be of only specialist interest, being a case which arose under the Athens Convention on the Carriage of Passengers by Sea. As Pill LJ points out, however, the test for liability under the Convention is essentially a negligence test and the issues which arose are substantially the same as would have arisen had the accident occurred on premises in England and Wales. The decision also reviews the oft-cited, and sometimes misunderstood, case of Ward v Tesco Stores Limited [1976] 1 All ER 219, [1976] IRLR 92.

The facts

The facts of Dawkins are relatively simple. The claimant was a passenger aboard the cruise ship Oriana. While walking through the conservatory restaurant at about 2pm she fell and suffered injury. The judge found as a fact that on the balance of probabilities she fell on some liquid, probably
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll