header-logo header-logo

Tidal waive

02 September 2011 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Ed Heaton examines a timely reminder to all about the dangers of waiving privilege

Lord Justice Ward described D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] All ER (D) 83 (Jun) as a case with “an interesting and unusual twist”. It related to serious injuries suffered by a 6-month-old boy, which included fractures to his left humerus, his left tibia and a number of his ribs. The particular matter before the Court of Appeal was the relatively simple question of the extent to which the mother had waived legal professional privilege.

In order to appreciate the judgment fully, one needs an understanding of the basic background to the case.

The facts

In a witness statement in January 2011, the mother indicated that the father had told her that the child had got his arm stuck between the fabric and the metal side of his buggy and that the father had therefore had to pull the child’s arm, which had resulted in injury. The mother specifically stated that she had “not witnessed anyone hurting”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll