header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Tidal waive

Ed Heaton examines a timely reminder to all about the dangers of waiving privilege

Lord Justice Ward described D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] All ER (D) 83 (Jun) as a case with “an interesting and unusual twist”. It related to serious injuries suffered by a 6-month-old boy, which included fractures to his left humerus, his left tibia and a number of his ribs. The particular matter before the Court of Appeal was the relatively simple question of the extent to which the mother had waived legal professional privilege.

In order to appreciate the judgment fully, one needs an understanding of the basic background to the case.

The facts

In a witness statement in January 2011, the mother indicated that the father had told her that the child had got his arm stuck between the fabric and the metal side of his buggy and that the father had therefore had to pull the child’s arm, which had resulted in injury. The mother specifically stated that she had “not witnessed anyone hurting”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll