header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Tidal waive

Ed Heaton examines a timely reminder to all about the dangers of waiving privilege

Lord Justice Ward described D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] All ER (D) 83 (Jun) as a case with “an interesting and unusual twist”. It related to serious injuries suffered by a 6-month-old boy, which included fractures to his left humerus, his left tibia and a number of his ribs. The particular matter before the Court of Appeal was the relatively simple question of the extent to which the mother had waived legal professional privilege.

In order to appreciate the judgment fully, one needs an understanding of the basic background to the case.

The facts

In a witness statement in January 2011, the mother indicated that the father had told her that the child had got his arm stuck between the fabric and the metal side of his buggy and that the father had therefore had to pull the child’s arm, which had resulted in injury. The mother specifically stated that she had “not witnessed anyone hurting”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll