header-logo header-logo

06 January 2017 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Time to adjust

nlj_7728_keen

Spencer Keen explores the limits of the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees

  • ​The duty to make adjustments requires an employer to take steps to avoid a disadvantage caused to a disabled employee by any of its provisions, criteria or practices.

Is a disabled employee who is transferred to a new role because he is unable to perform the old one entitled to keep his original salary even though the salary for his new role is normally lower? This was the difficult question the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has tasked with answering in the case of G4S Cash Solution Ltd v Mr Powell UKEAT/0243/15/RN. The EAT’s answer leaves employers more vulnerable to employee’s claims for additional pay (including sick pay) than was previously the case.

The facts

G4S was in the business of replenishing and maintaining cash machines. It employed engineers for this purpose. Mr Powell was employed as an engineer when he began to experience a problem with his lower back which led to him becoming unfit to perform jobs involving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll