header-logo header-logo

Time to adjust

06 January 2017 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7728_keen

Spencer Keen explores the limits of the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees

  • ​The duty to make adjustments requires an employer to take steps to avoid a disadvantage caused to a disabled employee by any of its provisions, criteria or practices.

Is a disabled employee who is transferred to a new role because he is unable to perform the old one entitled to keep his original salary even though the salary for his new role is normally lower? This was the difficult question the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has tasked with answering in the case of G4S Cash Solution Ltd v Mr Powell UKEAT/0243/15/RN. The EAT’s answer leaves employers more vulnerable to employee’s claims for additional pay (including sick pay) than was previously the case.

The facts

G4S was in the business of replenishing and maintaining cash machines. It employed engineers for this purpose. Mr Powell was employed as an engineer when he began to experience a problem with his lower back which led to him becoming unfit to perform jobs involving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll