header-logo header-logo

Time to adjust

06 January 2017 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7728_keen

Spencer Keen explores the limits of the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees

  • ​The duty to make adjustments requires an employer to take steps to avoid a disadvantage caused to a disabled employee by any of its provisions, criteria or practices.

Is a disabled employee who is transferred to a new role because he is unable to perform the old one entitled to keep his original salary even though the salary for his new role is normally lower? This was the difficult question the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has tasked with answering in the case of G4S Cash Solution Ltd v Mr Powell UKEAT/0243/15/RN. The EAT’s answer leaves employers more vulnerable to employee’s claims for additional pay (including sick pay) than was previously the case.

The facts

G4S was in the business of replenishing and maintaining cash machines. It employed engineers for this purpose. Mr Powell was employed as an engineer when he began to experience a problem with his lower back which led to him becoming unfit to perform jobs involving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll