header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Time to agree terms?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 September 2013 / Polly Dyer , HHJ Michael Hopmeier
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Polly Dyer & HHJ Michael Hopmeier assess the role & impact of DPAs at home & abroad

  • Section 45 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 enacts Schedule 17, which provides for the introduction of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs), is expected to come into force in February 2014.
  • DPAs will not be available for individuals, whether for individual crimes or for action untaken on behalf of an organisation. 
  • DPAs  can be used in relation to conduct pre-dating the commencement of the legislation.
  • Lessons learned from other jurisdictions.

The government’s latest instrument in the fight against economic crime is the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA). A DPA is a voluntary agreement between a prosecuting authority and a commercial organisation whereby, in return for complying with a range of stringent conditions including, eg the payment of a substantial financial penalty, requirements to make reparation to victims and participate in monitoring for a set period, the prosecutor will defer a criminal prosecution. If the required conditions are fulfilled, then the commercial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll