header-logo header-logo

A time bomb?

31 May 2012 / Dj John Doel
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

The clock is ticking on the debate over court attendance, says DJ John Doel

The Family Advocacy Scheme introduced by the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment) Order 2011 (SI 2011/1027) has been with us since 9 May 2011. It dictates how much you will be paid for publicly-funded family labour. In particular, it sets a fixed-fee for attendance at court for an interim hearing. The duration of the hearing is calculated from the time at which it was listed to commence. Attendances of longer than one hour attract a higher rate.

Provoking a riot

Advocates are now routinely asking district judges and family magistrates to order them to attend at a time earlier than the listed time of the case in order, they say, to take instructions and prepare their client. Enforcement of such a direction may not become an issue. Any failure to observe such a direction, while not amounting to a contempt of court, would incur the wrath of the court and a judge may feel

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll