header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / Gillian Charlesworth
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Time for change

Stamp duty is crying out for reform, says Gillian Charlesworth

In October 2007, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) held a breakfast meeting for MPs interested in discussing ideas for reform of stamp duty. The meeting was the beginning of a policy development process which culminated in July's publication of RICS' stamp duty policy and call on government to reform this unpopular tax. The work included detailed analysis by RICS economics team of the impact of various alterations to stamp duty rates, both in terms of savings for home buyers and potential revenue reduction for the government. We decided to depart from a revenue neutral proposition since one of our main conclusions was that the current system, which in recent years has only seen substantial increases in revenue for HM Treasury, is unfair and unhelpful. Today's market conditions confirm the need to act.

Marginal Rates

The central proposition of RICS' proposals is a move away from the current slab system towards the adoption of a two-tier marginal system. We believe that this will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll