header-logo header-logo

Time for change?

01 November 2013 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Commercial
printer mail-detail
013_nlj_7582_specialist_commercial_quershi

In the first of two leading articles, Khawar Qureshi QC puts ethics in international arbitration under the spotlight

This two-part article provides a summary of the rules and guidelines applicable to both arbitrators and counsel in international arbitration, along with examples of how these rules and guidelines have been applied in practice, and considers whether further regulation is needed.

The term “ethics” in this article is defined broadly as the “rules of conduct recognised in respect to a particular class of human actions of a particular group”.

Given the international nature of arbitration, and the differing cultural or contextual expectations of parties, as well as counsel, some commentators reject the contention that a uniform code of “ethics” can be applicable.

Nevertheless, precisely because some degree of uniformity is required to provide a measure of consistency and predictability (not to mention order), institutional rules which govern the arbitral process seek to define its parameters, while leaving the arbitrators with broad discretion to ensure that flexibility is maintained.

IBA

The International Bar Association

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll