header-logo header-logo

Time for change?

01 November 2013 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Commercial
printer mail-detail
013_nlj_7582_specialist_commercial_quershi

In the first of two leading articles, Khawar Qureshi QC puts ethics in international arbitration under the spotlight

This two-part article provides a summary of the rules and guidelines applicable to both arbitrators and counsel in international arbitration, along with examples of how these rules and guidelines have been applied in practice, and considers whether further regulation is needed.

The term “ethics” in this article is defined broadly as the “rules of conduct recognised in respect to a particular class of human actions of a particular group”.

Given the international nature of arbitration, and the differing cultural or contextual expectations of parties, as well as counsel, some commentators reject the contention that a uniform code of “ethics” can be applicable.

Nevertheless, precisely because some degree of uniformity is required to provide a measure of consistency and predictability (not to mention order), institutional rules which govern the arbitral process seek to define its parameters, while leaving the arbitrators with broad discretion to ensure that flexibility is maintained.

IBA

The International Bar Association

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll