header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / Kim Harrison
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Time for change

nlj_7785_harrison

Kim Harrison discusses consent & the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in relation to child sexual exploitation

  • Sufferers of child sexual exploitation now being recognised as genuine victims

  • Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority still behind the times and subject of much criticism.

  • Revised guidance issued on 31 October 2017 was welcomed, but the risk of victims being unfairly denied compensation remains.

Society’s perception of victims of child sexual exploitation (CSE) has greatly changed over the past decade. Victims of this crime are no longer routinely labelled ‘child prostitutes’ making a ‘lifestyle choice’ – instead police, CPS, social services and other agencies are recognising these children as genuine victims of sexual abuse and exploitation. Much progress has also been made in prosecuting perpetrators and successful civil claims have also been brought on behalf of CSE survivors against local authorities and other agencies who failed them.

The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA), however, has been slow to catch up. The CICA is a government funded body which pays compensation to victims of ‘crimes of violence’ if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll