header-logo header-logo

Time for change

16 March 2018 / Kim Harrison
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7785_harrison

Kim Harrison discusses consent & the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in relation to child sexual exploitation

  • Sufferers of child sexual exploitation now being recognised as genuine victims

  • Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority still behind the times and subject of much criticism.

  • Revised guidance issued on 31 October 2017 was welcomed, but the risk of victims being unfairly denied compensation remains.

Society’s perception of victims of child sexual exploitation (CSE) has greatly changed over the past decade. Victims of this crime are no longer routinely labelled ‘child prostitutes’ making a ‘lifestyle choice’ – instead police, CPS, social services and other agencies are recognising these children as genuine victims of sexual abuse and exploitation. Much progress has also been made in prosecuting perpetrators and successful civil claims have also been brought on behalf of CSE survivors against local authorities and other agencies who failed them.

The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA), however, has been slow to catch up. The CICA is a government funded body which pays compensation to victims of ‘crimes of violence’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll