header-logo header-logo

Time to change the rules?

16 December 2011 / Elizabeth Fitzgerald , John Summers
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

John Summers & Elizabeth Fitzgerald examine two recent judgments that challenge long-established property law rules

Trusts of the family home are the common law’s itch that won’t go away. When will residential property owned in one person’s name, or in more than one name, nevertheless respectively be owned in equity jointly, or on some basis other than as joint tenants? The question is pressing as the number of unmarried couples who acquire property without giving clear thought, or expression, to its ownership, rockets.

Beneficial interests

In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432 the House of Lords went some way towards relaxing the rules governing the assessment of beneficial interests. Lady Hale’s judgment adopted a holistic approach to the assessment of certain claims to shared beneficial ownership. The nature of that holistic enquiry has now been examined by the Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, [2011] All ER (D) 64 (Nov).

Stack: a recap

Stack concerned a property held in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll