header-logo header-logo

16 December 2011 / Elizabeth Fitzgerald , John Summers
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Time to change the rules?

John Summers & Elizabeth Fitzgerald examine two recent judgments that challenge long-established property law rules

Trusts of the family home are the common law’s itch that won’t go away. When will residential property owned in one person’s name, or in more than one name, nevertheless respectively be owned in equity jointly, or on some basis other than as joint tenants? The question is pressing as the number of unmarried couples who acquire property without giving clear thought, or expression, to its ownership, rockets.

Beneficial interests

In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432 the House of Lords went some way towards relaxing the rules governing the assessment of beneficial interests. Lady Hale’s judgment adopted a holistic approach to the assessment of certain claims to shared beneficial ownership. The nature of that holistic enquiry has now been examined by the Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, [2011] All ER (D) 64 (Nov).

Stack: a recap

Stack concerned a property held in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll