header-logo header-logo

16 December 2011 / Elizabeth Fitzgerald , John Summers
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Time to change the rules?

John Summers & Elizabeth Fitzgerald examine two recent judgments that challenge long-established property law rules

Trusts of the family home are the common law’s itch that won’t go away. When will residential property owned in one person’s name, or in more than one name, nevertheless respectively be owned in equity jointly, or on some basis other than as joint tenants? The question is pressing as the number of unmarried couples who acquire property without giving clear thought, or expression, to its ownership, rockets.

Beneficial interests

In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432 the House of Lords went some way towards relaxing the rules governing the assessment of beneficial interests. Lady Hale’s judgment adopted a holistic approach to the assessment of certain claims to shared beneficial ownership. The nature of that holistic enquiry has now been examined by the Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, [2011] All ER (D) 64 (Nov).

Stack: a recap

Stack concerned a property held in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll