header-logo header-logo

Time to engage

30 January 2015 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Businesses working across jurisdictions will increasingly have to deal with “human rights” issues, says Chris Syder

Human rights mean different things to different people. Consequently, human rights have different implications and contexts, not least because they belong to every person whatever their nationality, place of residence, gender, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language or any other status.

Universal human rights are often set out and guaranteed by law in the form of treaties, customary international law, general principles and other sources of international law. However, international or national human rights laws regretfully do not prevent human rights abuses. The limitations of government mean the role of socially responsible businesses then comes into sharp focus. But when a business examines the detail to engage effectively in human rights, it faces an increasingly complex and uncertain context.

How should business view human rights?

Human rights represent both risk and opportunity to business. Sometimes they are harnessed by pressure groups, such as global trade unions, to further their wider agendas which, not surprisingly, can make businesses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll