header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013 / Adrian Kwintner
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Limitation
printer mail-detail

Time pressure

istock_000005139948medium

Adrian Kwintner reviews the s 14A special time limit for negligence actions

Recent cases on the extended limitation period under s 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) show that defendants, and their insurers, should carefully review the nature and extent of a claimant’s knowledge of the “material facts”. Cases could be summarily dismissed by arguing the claimant had the requisite knowledge earlier than alleged.

Limitation Act 1980

Primary limitation for negligence actions in tort is six years from accrual of the cause of action. Section 14A provides an additional time limit for actions not involving personal injury. It applies where the claimant does not have knowledge of all the material facts at the date his cause of action accrues. The limitation period can then be extended to three years from the earliest date when the claimant had the knowledge required for bringing an action and a right to bring an action.

Necessity versus conviction

The High Court case of Roger Ward Associates Ltd v Britannia Assets (UK) Ltd [2013] EWHC 1653

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll