header-logo header-logo

20 March 2015 / Alan Kershaw
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time to switch?

nlj_7645_alan-kershaw_0

Alan Kershaw explains why CILEx Regulation stands out in a crowded market

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) has come a very long way over the past seven years.

As chair of its regulatory arm, ILEX Professional Standards Ltd (IPS), which we are now renaming CILEx Regulation, I have seen the realisation of aspirations which Chartered Legal Executives have nurtured for a generation or more: robust and affordable educational arrangements producing lawyers fully competent in their field; a diverse and vibrant professional community accurately reflecting the communities it serves; sensible, adult requirements for continuing professional development; the Royal Charter, recognising the Institute’s standing and its demonstrable public interest focus; modern, proportionate arrangements for regulation which are—believe it or not—recognised by CILEx members as a major benefit of their membership. And now, setting the seal, the right to practise in their own names as independent practitioners in all the legal specialties—litigation, advocacy, conveyancing, probate, immigration—and therefore to set up their own firms, which can themselves be regulated by CILEx Regulation.

Since 5 January

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll