header-logo header-logo

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Time to change the conversation around wills?

More than two-thirds of adults below the age of 50 and earning £50,000 or more per year do not have a will, law firm Collyer Bristow has warned.

The ‘baby boomer’ generation (those aged over 50) is believed to be the wealthiest in history, but the successive generation (those set to inherit this wealth) gave a range of reasons for not putting their financial affairs in order. Shortage of time was the most common excuse, followed by the belief they were too young or did not have enough assets to need a will, according to YouGov research commissioned by Collyer Bristow, ‘An Age of Apathy: Changing the conversation around wills’.

Across the age groups, four out of five respondents believe having a will is fairly or very important, and 31% of adults have made one.

Just under a quarter (23%) of respondents presumed erroneously that if they died intestate, all their assets and possessions would automatically be left to their partner. Only 46% of respondents would consult a legal professional to write a will.

More than half of respondents said they would make a will if they were diagnosed with a serious illness, and 40% said the arrival of children would prompt them to create or review a will.

James Cook, partner at Collyer Bristow, said: ‘The assumption that wealth is automatically passed onto a partner is particularly alarming and a common cause of disputes.

‘Similarly, when creating a will, individuals need to consider not only how to distribute their assets, but importantly, the tax implications of this. It is concerning that of those surveyed, 89% said that they have little to no knowledge of how inheritance tax is calculated.’

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll