header-logo header-logo

26 March 2014
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Times loss

Journalist loses appeal in Supreme Court over Freedom of Information request

A journalist for The Times has lost his Supreme Court case to force the Charity Commission to release documents relating to an inquiry into George Galloway MP’s Mariam Appeal charity. 

The Mariam Appeal was launched by Galloway in 1998 following the imposition of sanctions against Iraq. The Commission’s inquiry took place in 2003-2004.

Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20 concerned the question of whether the fact documents held by a public authority pursuant to an inquiry are statutorily exempt from Freedom of Information Act requests for 30 years after the inquiry, is a breach of Art 10(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Justices dismissed Kennedy’s appeal, since an absolute exemption from disclosure existed as a matter of ordinary statutory construction.

David White, solicitor, IP and commercial, Rollits, says: “Interestingly, both Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath stated that Mr Kennedy had a right to receive the requested information pursuant to his right to freedom of expression under Art 10 of the ECHR. 

“Furthermore, they held that the absolute exemption granted by s 32(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be read so that it expires at the end of the relevant inquiry rather than expiring 30 years following the completion of the inquiry. In my view, if the position of Lords Wilson and Carnwarth were upheld, public inquiries would be subject to earlier scrutiny and comment leading, potentially, to greater openness and transparency on public authorities.  

“This surely reflects the overall intention behind freedom of information. If this had been the prevailing view, however, it could have had a chilling effect on the effective conduct of inquiries. It could have caused a reluctance by third parties to be forthcoming in the provision of full information to a public authority conducting an inquiry, the irony being that such a chilling effect has the potential to reduce the very transparency FOIA seeks to uphold.”

Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
back-to-top-scroll