header-logo header-logo

11 September 2009 / Daphne Romney KC
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The tip of the iceberg?

Does Brennan mark the end of the bonus culture in local authorities? asks Daphne Romney QC

In Brennan v Sunderland City Council [2503297/08] the employment tribunal found that the bonuses paid to a number of men (in predominantly male jobs) were a sham. 

Bonuses were being used as a way of paying a predominately male workforce more than women doing equivalent but different jobs in contravention of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970). Brennan is just the tip of the iceberg. Judgments have already been handed down in a number of key cases on the discriminatory impact of bonus schemes and many others claims are yet to be decided. Bonus culture in local authority pay bargaining has been rife.

Equal pay laws

Under EPA 1970, a woman can claim equal pay with a man where she works in the same employment as he does (or, under Art 141 EC, that their employment is regulated by a “Single Source”), and either:
l she does like work (s 1(2)(a));
l she does work rated as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll