header-logo header-logo

22 January 2018
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Training & education
printer mail-detail

TLEF grants drive rule of law

Grants totalling £5m from The Legal Education Foundation (TLEF) funded trainee lawyer posts and helped legal teams support Grenfell Tower residents, among a range of projects last year.

TLEF’s annual review records its support for law centres, advice agencies, universities, charities and law firms. Its 91 grants in 2017 include £1.25m to create 15 traineeships at social justice organisations, £67,000 for North Kensington Law Centre’s dedicated Grenfell Response Team in the aftermath of the fire, £146,000 for a Legal Aid Practitioners Group programme of practice management training, £98,000 for a Disability Rights UK online interactive guide on legal rights for disabled people, and an innovative project to bring specialist lawyers together with homelessness outreach workers.

Matthew Smerdon, TLEF chief executive, said: 'Drawing all TLEF's work together is a driving belief in the role of the law as a tool to solve people's problems.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll