header-logo header-logo

To arbitrate or not to arbitrate?

02 May 2019 / Amy Fox
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Features , Family , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

What if you advise your client to pursue arbitration, only for them to receive an unfavourable result? Amy Fox weighs up the pros & cons of arbitration in family cases

  • Even though the options available to challenge an arbitral award are extremely limited, there are nonetheless many advantages to the arbitration route in family cases.

The recent case B C v BG [2019] EWFC 7, [2019] All ER (D) 142 (Jan) concerned an application by a wife for a judicial decision order that an arbitral award should not be made into a court order. The wife’s application asserted that:

  • there were fundamental and material errors in the arbitrator’s application of the law;
  • the law was applied unfairly;
  • there were various supervening events (including that the level of the maintenance award meant the wife could not obtain a mortgage and that the award did not meet the wife’s and the children’s needs); and
  • that the husband had failed to provide proper financial disclosure /had misled the tribunal, and had been
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll