header-logo header-logo

Self-disclosure: To out or be outed?

233326
Self-disclosure in a reputational crisis: Hanna Basha & Jamie Hurworth weigh up the benefits & pitfalls

Why did John Torode out himself as being the subject of an upheld finding of racist language during the investigation into co-host Gregg Wallace—even though he denied the allegation? Reputational genius or career suicide?

Torode’s decision was surprising because individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy when subject to a police investigation, up to the point of being charged with an offence, and employment, disciplinary or regulatory investigations are often conducted confidentially.

We don’t know if there was a risk of leaks, or if there had been any threats from media groups or elsewhere to out him, but if Torode had not named himself, it was unlikely that he could have been named at all at that stage.

A summary of the Wallace investigation published online revealed two upheld allegations about other individuals. By outing himself, Torode chose to avoid a media guessing game—possibly learning from the 2023

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll