header-logo header-logo

Self-disclosure: To out or be outed?

233326
Self-disclosure in a reputational crisis: Hanna Basha & Jamie Hurworth weigh up the benefits & pitfalls

Why did John Torode out himself as being the subject of an upheld finding of racist language during the investigation into co-host Gregg Wallace—even though he denied the allegation? Reputational genius or career suicide?

Torode’s decision was surprising because individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy when subject to a police investigation, up to the point of being charged with an offence, and employment, disciplinary or regulatory investigations are often conducted confidentially.

We don’t know if there was a risk of leaks, or if there had been any threats from media groups or elsewhere to out him, but if Torode had not named himself, it was unlikely that he could have been named at all at that stage.

A summary of the Wallace investigation published online revealed two upheld allegations about other individuals. By outing himself, Torode chose to avoid a media guessing game—possibly learning from the 2023

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll