header-logo header-logo

21 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-detail

Tolley Tax webinars: All about tax

Bring your tax learning home with Tolley Tax Webinars: Q2 2020

The one-hour audio-video broadcasts are delivered by industry experts and contain the latest, up-to-date information available at the time of broadcast. Each one is accompanied by a downloadable PowerPoint presentation and a podcast. They are an excellent way to complete your continuing competence requirements during the lockdown.

From litigation to international VAT, the webinars will keep you on top of the latest developments in your chosen field.

See the brochure for more information: https://www.lexiswebinars.co.uk/Tax-webinar-brochure-Q2-2020.pdf

@LexisUKWebinars

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll