header-logo header-logo

06 June 2014 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Too high a risk?

web_expertwitness_too_high_a_risk_solon

Is being an expert witness still worth it, asks Mark Solon

Being an expert witness has become much more of an exacting career path in recent years. No longer the “cushy number” some might have considered it 30 years ago, giving expert evidence in court is now fraught with new legislation. In particular, with the introduction of Lord Justice Jackson’s reforms last April, the focus has moved to cost, speed and narrowing down evidence to what is strictly relevant. Experts must now look much more carefully at their fees and what they can achieve within stricter timescales.

In addition, when, three years ago, the Supreme Court overturned centuries of established legal wisdom, expert witnesses could no longer enjoy protection from liability for negligence. Experts can now be sued if their work is found to be deficient. So one may well ask—is it still worth it? Is it safer to stick with the day job?

Change for the better?

Some experts admit they are now much more risk averse in the light of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll