header-logo header-logo

Too high a risk?

06 June 2014 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
web_expertwitness_too_high_a_risk_solon

Is being an expert witness still worth it, asks Mark Solon

Being an expert witness has become much more of an exacting career path in recent years. No longer the “cushy number” some might have considered it 30 years ago, giving expert evidence in court is now fraught with new legislation. In particular, with the introduction of Lord Justice Jackson’s reforms last April, the focus has moved to cost, speed and narrowing down evidence to what is strictly relevant. Experts must now look much more carefully at their fees and what they can achieve within stricter timescales.

In addition, when, three years ago, the Supreme Court overturned centuries of established legal wisdom, expert witnesses could no longer enjoy protection from liability for negligence. Experts can now be sued if their work is found to be deficient. So one may well ask—is it still worth it? Is it safer to stick with the day job?

Change for the better?

Some experts admit they are now much more risk averse in the light of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll