23 March 2012 / Gerard Forlin

Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory

printer

mail-detail

Too hot to handle?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

istock_000009520036medium_4

The heat is on for organisations & individuals who do not pay heed to fire safety precautions, notes Gerard Forlin QC

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (SI 2005/1541) (2005 Order) came into force on 1 October 2006, replacing regulations made under the Fire Precautions Act 1971 (FPA 1971). This order was made pursuant to the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 (RRA 2001) to be in compliance with the EU directive on fire safety in the workplace and business premises. There have been a series of recent cases where the fines have been gradually ramping up.

First relevant case?

Arguably, the first relevant case fell under the previous legislation. In R v ESB Hotels Ltd [2005] EWCA Crim 132, [2005] All ER (D) 159 (Jan) owners of a hotel pleaded guilty to two counts of contravening the requirements of a Fire Certificate, contrary to s 4 of FPA 1971. Bed mattresses had been stored in various corridors. Investigators found that the hotel staff did not appear to have a complete

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Too hot to handle?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

istock_000009520036medium_4

The heat is on for organisations & individuals who do not pay heed to fire safety precautions, notes Gerard Forlin QC

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (SI 2005/1541) (2005 Order) came into force on 1 October 2006, replacing regulations made under the Fire Precautions Act 1971 (FPA 1971). This order was made pursuant to the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 (RRA 2001) to be in compliance with the EU directive on fire safety in the workplace and business premises. There have been a series of recent cases where the fines have been gradually ramping up.

First relevant case?

Arguably, the first relevant case fell under the previous legislation. In R v ESB Hotels Ltd [2005] EWCA Crim 132, [2005] All ER (D) 159 (Jan) owners of a hotel pleaded guilty to two counts of contravening the requirements of a Fire Certificate, contrary to s 4 of FPA 1971. Bed mattresses had been stored in various corridors. Investigators found that the hotel staff did not appear to have a complete

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

back-to-top-scroll