header-logo header-logo

Too hot to handle?

23 March 2012 / Gerard Forlin
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
istock_000009520036medium_4

The heat is on for organisations & individuals who do not pay heed to fire safety precautions, notes Gerard Forlin QC

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (SI 2005/1541) (2005 Order) came into force on 1 October 2006, replacing regulations made under the Fire Precautions Act 1971 (FPA 1971). This order was made pursuant to the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 (RRA 2001) to be in compliance with the EU directive on fire safety in the workplace and business premises. There have been a series of recent cases where the fines have been gradually ramping up.

First relevant case?

Arguably, the first relevant case fell under the previous legislation. In R v ESB Hotels Ltd [2005] EWCA Crim 132, [2005] All ER (D) 159 (Jan) owners of a hotel pleaded guilty to two counts of contravening the requirements of a Fire Certificate, contrary to s 4 of FPA 1971. Bed mattresses had been stored in various corridors. Investigators found that the hotel staff did not appear to have a complete

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll