header-logo header-logo

04 February 2026
Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Property
printer mail-detail

Tool rolled out for collaborative conveyancing

Legal IT supplier InfoTrack has launched a conveyancing tool that speeds up the pre-contract enquiries stage by allowing both sides to collaborate in one shared workspace

The tool, Linked Enquiries, can be used regardless of whether the other party is an InfoTrack client, via a free guest pass. Conveyancers can then avoid lengthy email chains and manual copying and pasting.

When a firm publishes enquiries, it invites the counterparty to join the workspace using a secure code. Once connected, both sides see identical, real-time updates of all enquiries, responses and attachments. A time-stamped audit trail shows who said what and when, providing clear evidence of the conversation between both parties.

Scott Bozinis, chief executive officer at InfoTrack UK, said the tool gives ‘both sides the visibility and control needed to keep transactions moving’.

Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll