header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Top 100 not interested in LDPs

Lead players are showing scant interest in the new model law firms

Only 5% of the UK’s top 100 law firms believe the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) will have a “significant impact” on them.

Reforms under the Act, which come into force next week, introduce Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs)—law firms which include non-solicitor lawyers, and up to 25% non-lawyers.

The top 100 firms were quizzed by professional regulation law firm, Legal Risk LLP, for its sixth annual survey on professional indemnity and risk management.

Partner Frank Maher says: “Interest is very low, and we are not seeing what was envisaged, which was the head of marketing or IT becoming a partner.”

Maher says that a fifth of the top 100 firms, and a third of top 30 firms, thought the Act would have “no impact”, while the rest thought it would have “little impact”.

“Realistically, in the current economic climate, firms are not appointing many new partners, and we have had some people questioning why they would want to take on the liability of being a partner. Also, this is only an interim measure, and any firm that converts to LDP status now will have to convert to Alternative Business Structures in a few years’ time and conform to a whole new set of regulations,” Maher adds.

The survey also reveals that 16% of the firms questioned had delayed renewing their insurance because of concerns about the industry. Maher says: “This is a real issue. It’s not just about how secure these companies are now, but in five or seven years’ time when they have to pay out on claims.”

A third of firms chose Travelers as their insurer, and 22% chose QBE. Some 14% of fi rms overall, and 23% of top 30 firms, said they had changed their insurer, with price cited price as the main reason.

Issue: 7362 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll