header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Toppling the fourth pillar

The legal advice sector has long since suffered from a difficult relationship with local authority support, says Jon Robins

Over the last four decades, Hackney Community Law Centre has enjoyed a pretty good relationship with its council. That changed last month after its cabinet voted through a swingeing 45% cut in its £203,000 grant. This follows last year’s cut of £60,000 to its debt advice service.

As Steve Hynes notes elsewhere in this issue, 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the legal aid scheme. Hackney Community Law Centre’s manager Sean Canning points out that publicly funded legal advice is ‘the fourth pillar of the welfare state’. ‘We are deeply shocked and puzzled that this council should be hitting today’s custodians of that achievement of access to justice for the poor and vulnerable,’ he says.

Hackney Council’s advice services budget of £770,000 has been ringfenced. Speaking on behalf of the law centre’s trustees, councillor Deniz Oguzkanli notes that, although austerity has hit all of the borough’s services, this was ‘a deliberate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll