header-logo header-logo

Toppling the fourth pillar

11 April 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

The legal advice sector has long since suffered from a difficult relationship with local authority support, says Jon Robins

Over the last four decades, Hackney Community Law Centre has enjoyed a pretty good relationship with its council. That changed last month after its cabinet voted through a swingeing 45% cut in its £203,000 grant. This follows last year’s cut of £60,000 to its debt advice service.

As Steve Hynes notes elsewhere in this issue, 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the legal aid scheme. Hackney Community Law Centre’s manager Sean Canning points out that publicly funded legal advice is ‘the fourth pillar of the welfare state’. ‘We are deeply shocked and puzzled that this council should be hitting today’s custodians of that achievement of access to justice for the poor and vulnerable,’ he says.

Hackney Council’s advice services budget of £770,000 has been ringfenced. Speaking on behalf of the law centre’s trustees, councillor Deniz Oguzkanli notes that, although austerity has hit all of the borough’s services, this was ‘a deliberate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll