header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Toppling the fourth pillar

The legal advice sector has long since suffered from a difficult relationship with local authority support, says Jon Robins

Over the last four decades, Hackney Community Law Centre has enjoyed a pretty good relationship with its council. That changed last month after its cabinet voted through a swingeing 45% cut in its £203,000 grant. This follows last year’s cut of £60,000 to its debt advice service.

As Steve Hynes notes elsewhere in this issue, 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the legal aid scheme. Hackney Community Law Centre’s manager Sean Canning points out that publicly funded legal advice is ‘the fourth pillar of the welfare state’. ‘We are deeply shocked and puzzled that this council should be hitting today’s custodians of that achievement of access to justice for the poor and vulnerable,’ he says.

Hackney Council’s advice services budget of £770,000 has been ringfenced. Speaking on behalf of the law centre’s trustees, councillor Deniz Oguzkanli notes that, although austerity has hit all of the borough’s services, this was ‘a deliberate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll