header-logo header-logo

06 October 2017
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tort

South Gloucestershire Council v Burge and another [2017] EWCA Civ 1313, [2017] All ER (D) 14 (Oct)

The provisions of art 9(4)(c) of the Tree Preservation Order 2007 (TPO) related to the exclusions of the entitlement to compensation under art 9 of the TPO and were not tied to a specific point in time at which the question fell to be considered. The Upper Tribunal (Lands Tribunal), in deciding compensation, had restricted its conclusions solely to a particular point in time. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division found that that had been to impose an artificial constraint on the consideration of reasonable foreseeability of the relevant ‘loss or damage’ and reasonable steps ‘to avert it’ or ‘to mitigate its extent’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll