header-logo header-logo

11 December 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tough times

robins_1

Jon Robins reports on the latest clashes surrounding the LASPO cutbacks

When Margaret Hodge, as chair of the House of Commons public accounts committee, grilled Google executives, she famously quoted its corporate motto “Don’t be evil” before reflecting “I think that you do do evil”. There was an echo of that bruising encounter when her committee hauled senior Ministry of Justice (MoJ) executives over the coals last week.

Margaret Hodge asked Catherine Lee, director of access to justice at the MoJ, whether her job was “about facilitating or inhibiting access to justice”? The session began badly for the MoJ before going rapidly downhill.

Their interrogation followed on from last month’s National Audit Office (NAO) report (Implementing reforms to civil legal aid). It accused ministers of not “thinking through enough” the impact of the LASPO cuts, nor, it was argued, did they sufficiently understand whether those still eligible for legal aid could actually find help. As a consequence, the spending watchdog argued that £300m worth of legal aid cuts could not be said

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll