header-logo header-logo

11 December 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tough times

robins_1

Jon Robins reports on the latest clashes surrounding the LASPO cutbacks

When Margaret Hodge, as chair of the House of Commons public accounts committee, grilled Google executives, she famously quoted its corporate motto “Don’t be evil” before reflecting “I think that you do do evil”. There was an echo of that bruising encounter when her committee hauled senior Ministry of Justice (MoJ) executives over the coals last week.

Margaret Hodge asked Catherine Lee, director of access to justice at the MoJ, whether her job was “about facilitating or inhibiting access to justice”? The session began badly for the MoJ before going rapidly downhill.

Their interrogation followed on from last month’s National Audit Office (NAO) report (Implementing reforms to civil legal aid). It accused ministers of not “thinking through enough” the impact of the LASPO cuts, nor, it was argued, did they sufficiently understand whether those still eligible for legal aid could actually find help. As a consequence, the spending watchdog argued that £300m worth of legal aid cuts could not be said

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll