header-logo header-logo

14 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning

Dunnett Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWCA Civ 192, [2017] All ER (D) 27 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant’s appeal, which arose from the second defendant local planning authority’s purported refusal of its application for change of use of a site from Class B1(a), namely offices, to Class C3, namely dwelling houses, and for a lawful development certificate for a Class C3, on the basis that a condition imposed in February 2005 excluded rights under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (SI 1995/418) (the 1995 order) and that the condition restricted the use of the site to B1 only. The court agreed with the lower court and held that, on its proper construction, the planning condition in question excluded the operation of the 1995 order. It held that, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used was that the condition allowed planning permission for other uses, but restricted to that obtained upon application from the local planning authority, and excluded planning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll