header-logo header-logo

14 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning

Dunnett Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWCA Civ 192, [2017] All ER (D) 27 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant’s appeal, which arose from the second defendant local planning authority’s purported refusal of its application for change of use of a site from Class B1(a), namely offices, to Class C3, namely dwelling houses, and for a lawful development certificate for a Class C3, on the basis that a condition imposed in February 2005 excluded rights under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (SI 1995/418) (the 1995 order) and that the condition restricted the use of the site to B1 only. The court agreed with the lower court and held that, on its proper construction, the planning condition in question excluded the operation of the 1995 order. It held that, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used was that the condition allowed planning permission for other uses, but restricted to that obtained upon application from the local planning authority, and excluded planning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll