header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning

Metacre Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2011] EWHC 2271 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 88 (Oct)

The exercise in accordance with s 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 required the secretary of state to balance the competing tensions of national, regional and local planning policies, that was to say the need to deliver land for housing, for example RS and PPS3, against the restriction of development in the countryside, for example, FBLP.

It was established law that the weight to be given to any particular material consideration and the making of a planning judgment was a matter for the decision maker not for the court. The reasons given for a planning decision had to be capable of being understood by the reader but ought to be treated with a degree of flexibility.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll