header-logo header-logo

05 March 2010
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trade marks

Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 110

If an application to register a Community Trade Mark (CTM) was made in bad faith, then under Art 51(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/9/EEC the registration was to be declared invalid. Attention was to be focused on the position at the time of the application for registration, and the intention and state of mind of the applicant at that time, although they were subjective factors, they were to be determined by reference to the objective circumstances of the particular case.

A CTM did not entitle the proprietor to prohibit a third party from using in the course of trade his own name or address, provided that the third party used them in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. Using an established trading name might well satisfy the test of honest use, whereas to adopt a new corporate or trading name for a business which conflicted with an existing registered trade mark was unlikely to do so.

The mischief of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll