header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Denise Mcfarland
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Trade marks up in smoke

Mastercigars has unravelled the complexities of parallel importation, says Denise McFarland

A recent Court of Appeal decision in which the issue of parallel importation of trade marked goods was reviewed has resulted in a decision packed with common sense and demystification of a complex area of EU law. The judgment was handed down on 8 March 2007 in Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Hunters & Frankau Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 176, [2007] All ER (D) 132 (Mar). The goods in issue were consignments of habanos, which are hand-made Cuban cigars. It was alleged at trial that the consignments were counterfeit, and amounted to trade mark infringement, as unlawful parallel imports.

 At first instance [2006] EWHC 410 (Ch), [2006] All ER (D) 159 (Mar), Judge Michael Fysh QC, sitting as a High Court judge, gave a lengthy judgment. The trial lasted 16 days. Judge Fysh concluded that the major part had been dealing with the counterfeit issues. These allegations were dismissed and were not the subject of any appeal.

Practical decision

The question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll