header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Denise Mcfarland
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Trade marks up in smoke

Mastercigars has unravelled the complexities of parallel importation, says Denise McFarland

A recent Court of Appeal decision in which the issue of parallel importation of trade marked goods was reviewed has resulted in a decision packed with common sense and demystification of a complex area of EU law. The judgment was handed down on 8 March 2007 in Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Hunters & Frankau Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 176, [2007] All ER (D) 132 (Mar). The goods in issue were consignments of habanos, which are hand-made Cuban cigars. It was alleged at trial that the consignments were counterfeit, and amounted to trade mark infringement, as unlawful parallel imports.

 At first instance [2006] EWHC 410 (Ch), [2006] All ER (D) 159 (Mar), Judge Michael Fysh QC, sitting as a High Court judge, gave a lengthy judgment. The trial lasted 16 days. Judge Fysh concluded that the major part had been dealing with the counterfeit issues. These allegations were dismissed and were not the subject of any appeal.

Practical decision

The question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll