header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trade union

Serco Ltd (trading as Serco Docklands) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers [2011] EWCA Civ 226, [2011] All ER (D) 65 (Mar)

If a member who was not entitled to vote was wrongly given the opportunity to do so, that would be a breach of s 230(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, rather than s 227(1); however, s 232B applied whichever section was infringed. The premise of s 232B was that there was a breach of s 227 or s 230(2) as the case might be, otherwise the section would not come into play.

Where s 230(2) was infringed, the premise was that the union had not done what was reasonably practicable to prevent those not entitled to vote from voting. The only question was why it had failed to prevent them voting. If it conferred the opportunity to vote on those whom it knew or should have known would not subsequently be induced to take part in the strike then it could not rely on the exception.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll