header-logo header-logo

Trade union

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Serco Ltd (trading as Serco Docklands) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers [2011] EWCA Civ 226, [2011] All ER (D) 65 (Mar)

If a member who was not entitled to vote was wrongly given the opportunity to do so, that would be a breach of s 230(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, rather than s 227(1); however, s 232B applied whichever section was infringed. The premise of s 232B was that there was a breach of s 227 or s 230(2) as the case might be, otherwise the section would not come into play.

Where s 230(2) was infringed, the premise was that the union had not done what was reasonably practicable to prevent those not entitled to vote from voting. The only question was why it had failed to prevent them voting. If it conferred the opportunity to vote on those whom it knew or should have known would not subsequently be induced to take part in the strike then it could not rely on the exception.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll