header-logo header-logo

25 May 2017
Issue: 7747 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trademarking shapes ‘increasingly difficult’

An attempt to trademark the distinctive four-fingered shape of a KitKat has failed in the Court of Appeal.

The court held the design had ‘no inherent distinctiveness’, in Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 358.

Guy Wilmot, partner at Russell-Cooke, said: ‘The appeal court’s ruling indicates that shape marks are going to be increasingly difficult to obtain. The question was whether the public strongly associated the four finger shape itself with KitKat, even if all other branding (including the KitKat logo) is removed and also whether the public treats the shape as a “badge of origin”. ’

Wilmot added that the court found that while the public may associate the shape with KitKat bars they did not use the shape of the bar alone to conclude that the product is a KitKat.

‘The court was also concerned that if they granted the trade mark Nestlé would have a potentially permanent monopoly on the four finger shape, which they felt would be unfair given that KitKat had never used the shape alone to promote KitKats,’ he added.

Issue: 7747 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll