header-logo header-logo

Trading rights for shares: employee shareholder scheme goes live

02 September 2013
Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employees can now trade their rights at work for shares as the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s controversial “employee shareholder” scheme takes effect this week.

In return for at least £2,000 worth of shares in their employer company, employees will give up their rights not be unfairly dismissed in certain circumstances, to statutory redundancy payment, to request time off for study or training, to make a flexible working request, and to give only eight weeks’ notice to return early from maternity, adoption or parental leave.

However, they will still be protected from discrimination-related dismissal, health and safety-related dismissal and automatically unfair dismissal. If returning from parental leave, they can make a flexible working request within 14 days of their return.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, employment law solicitor Roderick Ramage describes the scheme as “harebrained”.

He warns that the value of shareholdings in unquoted companies is often “illusory rather than real”; that valuing the shares is “an uncertain exercise”; that dismissed employees might claim employment rights on the grounds the valuation was incorrect and the shares are worth less than £2,000; and that employees will lose both statutory redundancy and their shares in the event of insolvency.

From a company owner’s perspective, minority shareholdings dilute the controlling shareholders’ rights and create regulatory complications, he said.

The scheme, introduced under the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, took effect on 1 September. However, according to a report in the Daily Telegraph “only a handful” of companies has shown any interest.

Daniel Barnett, employment barrister at Outer Temple Chambers, said: “Takeup is expected to be highest with startup companies and with highly paid senior executives, where they can take advantage of the first £50,000 capital gains on those shares being tax free.

“There are protections built in when the employer offers a job on this basis: the employee shareholder must be given full written details of the rights s/he is giving up and the type of shares being offered, s/he has a right to independent advice (to be paid for by the employer) and a seven-day cooling off period.”

“Problems will arise if an employee-shareholder leaves the company and wants to sell back the shares. If the company is not listed on the stock market, valuing the shares is elusive and the employee may find themselves stuck with whatever the employer offers.”

 

Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll