header-logo header-logo

02 September 2013
Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Trading rights for shares: employee shareholder scheme goes live

Employees can now trade their rights at work for shares as the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s controversial “employee shareholder” scheme takes effect this week.

In return for at least £2,000 worth of shares in their employer company, employees will give up their rights not be unfairly dismissed in certain circumstances, to statutory redundancy payment, to request time off for study or training, to make a flexible working request, and to give only eight weeks’ notice to return early from maternity, adoption or parental leave.

However, they will still be protected from discrimination-related dismissal, health and safety-related dismissal and automatically unfair dismissal. If returning from parental leave, they can make a flexible working request within 14 days of their return.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, employment law solicitor Roderick Ramage describes the scheme as “harebrained”.

He warns that the value of shareholdings in unquoted companies is often “illusory rather than real”; that valuing the shares is “an uncertain exercise”; that dismissed employees might claim employment rights on the grounds the valuation was incorrect and the shares are worth less than £2,000; and that employees will lose both statutory redundancy and their shares in the event of insolvency.

From a company owner’s perspective, minority shareholdings dilute the controlling shareholders’ rights and create regulatory complications, he said.

The scheme, introduced under the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, took effect on 1 September. However, according to a report in the Daily Telegraph “only a handful” of companies has shown any interest.

Daniel Barnett, employment barrister at Outer Temple Chambers, said: “Takeup is expected to be highest with startup companies and with highly paid senior executives, where they can take advantage of the first £50,000 capital gains on those shares being tax free.

“There are protections built in when the employer offers a job on this basis: the employee shareholder must be given full written details of the rights s/he is giving up and the type of shares being offered, s/he has a right to independent advice (to be paid for by the employer) and a seven-day cooling off period.”

“Problems will arise if an employee-shareholder leaves the company and wants to sell back the shares. If the company is not listed on the stock market, valuing the shares is elusive and the employee may find themselves stuck with whatever the employer offers.”

 

Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll