header-logo header-logo

18 January 2018
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Trainees left in no man’s land in job quest

The Law Society has stepped in to stop law firms leaving trainees on tenterhooks over whether they will be kept on after qualification.

According to the Junior Lawyers Division (JLD), some newly qualified lawyers are only told at the eleventh hour that they will be kept on, while others find themselves unemployed without enough notice period to secure jobs elsewhere. Moreover, some firms are reluctant to tell trainees when a decision will be made.

In response to a request by the JLD, the Law Society has agreed to implement new guidance on retention notice periods for trainees. It will advise firms to tell trainees whether or not they are being kept on at least eight weeks in advance of their expected admission date.

The guidance will also advise firms to give trainees the time at which they will be informed of the decision at least 12 weeks in advance.

Issue: 7777 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll