header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Trainees offered gap year

Profession

City firms are offering trainees cash incentives to defer their places and take a year’s sabbatical in response to the recession.

Norton Rose is offering students scheduled to begin their training contracts in September the chance to take a year out with £10,000 of the firm’s money.
Penningtons is offering deferral plus a bursary of £5,000 to its 2009 and 2010 intake. Four out of ten of its 2009 trainees and one of its ten 2010 trainees have so far taken up the offer. A spokesperson said the firm had taken the decision “in response to the economic situation” and because the firm felt “there would be more good quality work around” at a later stage.
DLA Piper is offering its trainees £5,000 to defer their place. Lovells is offering trainees the option to defer, and is offering incentives on a sliding scale of up to £5,000 (£2,500 if the trainee takes six months out). Linklaters has not yet decided if it will follow suit.

Currently, the trend appears to be unique to City firms. National law firm Pannones, which has 19 trainees due to start in September, said it would not be asking trainees to defer. However, training partner Andrea Cohen added that “as in previous years” such requests would be considered from trainees.

Issue: 7360 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll