header-logo header-logo

Training to tackle forced marriage cases

10 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government has launched the first interactive online training tool to help lawyers and other professionals handle forced marriage cases.

The Forced Marriage Unit (FMU) resource, “Forced Marriage E-learning” uses scenarios based on real life stories to show professionals how to identify the first warning signs, provide the right support and reach a positive outcome. It encourages anyone who comes in to contact with those affected to work together closely in order to protect victims.

In 2009, FMU received 1,682 calls or e-mails to its helpline about potential incidents of forced marriage. Under the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act (2007), victims of forced marriage or others acting on their behalf, can apply for a forced marriage protection order. These can be used to prevent someone being forced into marriage, or to protect someone where a marriage has already taken place. Non-compliance with the orders can lead to arrest.

Olaf Henricson-Bell, FMU joint head, says: “Front line professionals may only have one chance to help someone at risk of forced marriage, and making the wrong call could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll