header-logo header-logo

10 October 2025 / Antonia Mee
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Features , Profession , Family , Abuse
printer mail-detail

Trauma-informed practice

231874
Antonia Mee on why all professionals involved in family law should be trained to recognise trauma
  • Trauma is the lasting impact that an event or experience has on someone’s nervous system, beliefs and sense of self.
  • Those suffering trauma often can’t concentrate on what we need them to do or provide the detail required from them.
  • Trauma-informed lawyers can recognise the classic trauma responses, and they understand strategies for self-regulation that clients can use before and during meetings or at court.

The solicitors at my family law firm are trauma-informed. They have been trained by a team of psychotherapists to recognise when clients are experiencing trauma, and they have been given tools to help those clients to cope with the legal process. In my view, given the nature of family law, every professional involved, from judges to lawyers to CAFCASS officers, should become trauma-informed.

Trauma

Trauma is the lasting impact that an event or experience has on someone’s nervous system, beliefs and sense of self. People can acquire

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll