header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Helen Pugh , Michael Fletcher
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Trial technology (Pt 1)

nlj_7787_cover_0

In the first part of a new series Michael Fletcher & Helen Pugh roadtest technology at trial

  • Technological advances are changing the way in which trials are conducted.
  • Real-time transcription is particularly well-established and is an invaluable tool.
  • E-bundles and the electronic presentation of evidence have the biggest potential.

It is impossible to ignore the impact of technology on modern life. The disruptive change which technology has brought to many industries such as the taxi and minicab industry has often occurred swiftly. So too the benefits to consumers: ten years ago, no lawyer could have arrived at court via Uber, because the company did not exist.

In contrast, the pace of technological change in the court room has been slow. The concept of ‘paperless trials’ has been around for many years, but they are (at best) rare at county court level. It is only in this decade that significant High Court trials have, sometimes, started to use electronic bundles. While the Rolls Building in London was opened

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll