header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Helen Pugh , Michael Fletcher
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Trial technology (Pt 1)

nlj_7787_cover_0

In the first part of a new series Michael Fletcher & Helen Pugh roadtest technology at trial

  • Technological advances are changing the way in which trials are conducted.
  • Real-time transcription is particularly well-established and is an invaluable tool.
  • E-bundles and the electronic presentation of evidence have the biggest potential.

It is impossible to ignore the impact of technology on modern life. The disruptive change which technology has brought to many industries such as the taxi and minicab industry has often occurred swiftly. So too the benefits to consumers: ten years ago, no lawyer could have arrived at court via Uber, because the company did not exist.

In contrast, the pace of technological change in the court room has been slow. The concept of ‘paperless trials’ has been around for many years, but they are (at best) rare at county court level. It is only in this decade that significant High Court trials have, sometimes, started to use electronic bundles. While the Rolls Building in London was opened

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll