header-logo header-logo

Trial technology (Pt 3)

20 April 2018 / Helen Pugh , Michael Fletcher
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7787_fletcher_0

In their third update on trial technology Michael Fletcher & Helen Pugh discuss the drivers for change

The legal community has perhaps been too slow to adopt electronic technology at trial, but, despite the ‘stumbling blocks’ discussed in the last update (see ‘Trial technology’ (Pt 2), 13 April 2018), there are now a number of drivers for change.

First, the courts are increasingly encouraging the use of court-room technology. The shift to mandatory e-filing in the Business & Property Courts is a step in this direction; the obvious progression from paperless filing is paperless bundles. From a purely practical perspective, e-bundles will be far easier for court staff to manage, they take no storage space at court, and are therefore likely to save costs.

Judges also now appreciate the advantages of technology more and, as time passes, are inevitably becoming more digitally astute. Several years ago, many High Court judges would have regarded the idea of an electronic trial bundle with suspicion. Now, the question we are increasingly seeing asked at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll