header-logo header-logo

Trial technology (Pt 3)

20 April 2018 / Helen Pugh , Michael Fletcher
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7787_fletcher_0

In their third update on trial technology Michael Fletcher & Helen Pugh discuss the drivers for change

The legal community has perhaps been too slow to adopt electronic technology at trial, but, despite the ‘stumbling blocks’ discussed in the last update (see ‘Trial technology’ (Pt 2), 13 April 2018), there are now a number of drivers for change.

First, the courts are increasingly encouraging the use of court-room technology. The shift to mandatory e-filing in the Business & Property Courts is a step in this direction; the obvious progression from paperless filing is paperless bundles. From a purely practical perspective, e-bundles will be far easier for court staff to manage, they take no storage space at court, and are therefore likely to save costs.

Judges also now appreciate the advantages of technology more and, as time passes, are inevitably becoming more digitally astute. Several years ago, many High Court judges would have regarded the idea of an electronic trial bundle with suspicion. Now, the question we are increasingly seeing asked at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll