header-logo header-logo

17 May 2024 / Catrina Smith
Issue: 8071 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Tribunal fees: back from the dead?

172558
The government is seeking to resurrect tribunal fees, posing serious questions about access to justice. The benefits are unclear, writes Catrina Smith
  • Proposals to introduce a fee for claimants in the employment tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal raise access to justice issues, and the government has acknowledged that the fee scheme will cost more to administer and implement than it will raise.
  • If enacted in their current form, the proposals could be found to be unlawful.

The government has announced proposals to introduce a fee for claimants in the employment tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). However, if enacted in their current form, they could suffer the same fate as the previous fees regime and be quashed as being unlawful.

The earlier fees regime was in place between 2013 and 2017 under the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 (SI 2013/1893), which introduced fees of between £160 and £1,600. The introduction of fees resulted in a significant drop—nearly 70%—in the number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll