header-logo header-logo

Tribunal fees: back from the dead?

17 May 2024 / Catrina Smith
Issue: 8071 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
172558
The government is seeking to resurrect tribunal fees, posing serious questions about access to justice. The benefits are unclear, writes Catrina Smith
  • Proposals to introduce a fee for claimants in the employment tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal raise access to justice issues, and the government has acknowledged that the fee scheme will cost more to administer and implement than it will raise.
  • If enacted in their current form, the proposals could be found to be unlawful.

The government has announced proposals to introduce a fee for claimants in the employment tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). However, if enacted in their current form, they could suffer the same fate as the previous fees regime and be quashed as being unlawful.

The earlier fees regime was in place between 2013 and 2017 under the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 (SI 2013/1893), which introduced fees of between £160 and £1,600. The introduction of fees resulted in a significant drop—nearly 70%—in the number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll