header-logo header-logo

11 September 2014
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tribunal fees have deterrent effect

Official figures reveal a steep decline in the number of employment claims raised in the UK since tribunal fees were introduced last year.

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) statistics published this week show a 59% drop in cases lodged between August 2013 and the end of March 2014 compared to the same eight-month period in the previous year (16,206 compared to 39,567).

The period between April and June 2014 also showed a decrease (4,245 claims lodged compared to 13,899 in the same quarter the previous year) but the figures are not comparable due to the introduction of early conciliation in April. All potential claims must now be referred to Acas before they can be lodged, which delays cases by up to one month.

Potential litigants have, since 29 July 2013, been required to pay an issue fee to lodge a claim and a hearing fee to proceed to a full hearing. While fees can be reduced or waived in certain circumstances, this is rarely granted. Fees range from £160 to £250 to issue a claim, and £230 to £950 for a hearing.

According to Innes Clark, head of employment law at Morton Fraser, the statistics will increase pressure on the government to reform the system.

“Whilst employers should not be faced with spurious claims, the impact of the fee requirements has been to create a major barrier to access to justice,” he says. 

“The fee regime has unfairly hit low paid workers in particular, who should not be deterred, on grounds of cost, from pursuing legitimate claims. The publication of these statistics is further strong evidence that reform is needed.”

Trade union Unison unsuccessfully challenged the fee regime in the High Court earlier this year. An appeal is scheduled to be heard next week (18 September). The Labour Party has said it will reform the fees regime if it forms the next government.

 

Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll