header-logo header-logo

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tribunals

Eclipse Film Partners No. 35 Llp v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWCA Civ 184, [2014] All ER (D) 247 (Feb)

It did not follow that, because the First-Tier Tribunal (the FTT) had power to make a case management direction which had costs consequences, it had power to make an order that one or both parties bear the costs of compliance. While many case management decisions would have the consequence of imposing a costs burden on one or both parties, the order made in the instant case, that the costs of preparing the bundles be shared had been an order in respect of costs, within the meaning of r 10(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/273) and, thus, outwith the power of the FTT. The order had been caught by r 10 of the rules notwithstanding that it had been made during the course of the preparation of the proceedings, rather than after the proceedings had been determined.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll