header-logo header-logo

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tribunals

Eclipse Film Partners No. 35 Llp v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWCA Civ 184, [2014] All ER (D) 247 (Feb)

It did not follow that, because the First-Tier Tribunal (the FTT) had power to make a case management direction which had costs consequences, it had power to make an order that one or both parties bear the costs of compliance. While many case management decisions would have the consequence of imposing a costs burden on one or both parties, the order made in the instant case, that the costs of preparing the bundles be shared had been an order in respect of costs, within the meaning of r 10(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/273) and, thus, outwith the power of the FTT. The order had been caught by r 10 of the rules notwithstanding that it had been made during the course of the preparation of the proceedings, rather than after the proceedings had been determined.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll